Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

ProgressCompass: Embodied Progress Reward Models Are Lost Without the Right Context

Embodied agents now take on ever longer tasks. For long tasks, knowing only whether a task finally succeeds or fails says little; the steps along the way matter. Progress Reward Models (PRMs) score how far a task has come at every step, and serve as dense rewards, verifiers and monitors. Yet in long tasks the current frame alone often cannot tell how far the task has come, because progress depends on what happened before. We call this problem context-dependent progress estimation. Existing benchmarks on progress estimation mostly focus on short tasks whose progress can be read from the current observation, and whether PRMs can estimate progress when context is needed remains underexplored...

AuthorsJianshu Zhang, Keliang Wu, Chengxuan Qian et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published29 September 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/5a80959a-b1ce-4927-aba9-fdf8d203fd02" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 19 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.