Does Latent Planning Survive Point Clouds? Action-Conditioned JEPA World Models for Geometric Observations and Goals
Latent action world models let agents plan new behaviors at test time by predicting how actions change the environment, and joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPAs) do so by forecasting future latent states rather than pixels. Yet nearly all such models see the world through a camera, even though robotic manipulation is fundamentally geometric: in robotics goals for manipulation are traditionally specified by target object poses, not by images of the object once placed. We ask whether latent planning survives a shift from appearance to geometry, on the observation side as well as on the goal specifications side. To answer this, we extend the stable-worldmodel evaluation platform w...
| Authors | Fabio F. Oberweger, Michael Schwingshackl, Markus Murschitz |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.LG |
| Published | 29 August 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 28 September 2026 |
Connected in the knowledge graph
- fafraob/point-cloud-pushtDataset · cited by
- fafraob/point-cloud-reacherDataset · cited by
- fafraob/point-cloud-ogb-cubeDataset · cited by
- fafraob/point-cloud-tworoomDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- fafraob/point-cloud-ogb-cubeDataset
- fafraob/point-cloud-pushtDataset
- fafraob/point-cloud-reacherDataset
- fafraob/point-cloud-tworoomDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.