Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Instruction Tax on Factual Recall: Base Models Can Beat Their Instruction-Tuned Counterparts

We present our solution to the AKBC LM-KBC 2026 Shared Task, where we achieved a score of 0.6836 on the official leaderboard, more than double the baseline of 0.2964. This task requires generating all possible objects for subject-relation pairs using a language model with up to 32 billion parameters, with no retrieval or fine-tuning involved. We show that the prompting methodology is as important as the model architecture: while the instruction-tuned model version achieves 0.5681 with its chat interface, the base model achieves 0.6836 when prompted using text completion. Thus, instruction tuning decreases factual recall; we refer to this effect as the instruction tax, which is caused by t...

AuthorsChristophe Khalil, Aya Mourad
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/82e3b53e-3ed5-408e-8da5-a3c55cc1701e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.