Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Predicting silent failures of learned inference under restricted access: what measurement physics and prior information explain

Learned priors are used to reconstruct regions that measurements barely reach, and to report uncertainty there. They can fail silently: the reported interval excludes the truth while every ground-truth-free diagnostic stays within its noise. We call such errors the blind set and ask whether they can be predicted before the target data are seen. For a correctly specified linear-Gaussian model averaged over the prior, the risk of a silent failure factorises exactly into non-detection and non-coverage, which does not hold for learned systems in general; we build a score that approximates this reference by linearising a VAE prior. In a prospective study on real X-ray CT objects (2DeteCT) unde...

AuthorsMario Gianni
Primary categorystat.ML
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
stat.MLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d764089f-9455-49fa-ac79-f4bba22f55fe" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.