Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Fixed Sets and the Hardness of Computing Correlated Equilibria

We show that computing an approximate correlated equilibrium of a polytope game is PPAD-complete, and thus polynomial-time equivalent to finding a Nash equilibrium. This challenges the conventional view in game theory that correlated equilibria are more tractable objects than Nash equilibria. From a conceptual standpoint, we connect correlated equilibria to a natural generalization of fixed points, which we call fixed sets. A fixed set of a continuous function $f$ is a nonempty finite set $S$ such that $S \subseteq \operatorname{conv} f(S)$. Our main technical contribution is to prove that computing a fixed set is PPAD-hard even at inverse polynomial precision.

AuthorsIoannis Anagnostides, Constantinos Daskalakis, Gabriele Farina et al.
Primary categorycs.GT
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.GTcs.CCcs.DScs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/1c24a783-59c9-4e91-8479-b052dcc8284a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.