Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

WildAIGC-Bench: Can AI Image Detectors Handle the Wild? A Benchmark of Generated and Edited Images in Online Circulation

AI-generated images linked to news events and online claims can mislead audiences, enable fraud, or cause public controversy. We introduce WildAIGC-Bench, built through recurring collection across news websites, fact-checking sources, and related social media content. The pipeline combines broad coverage, timely updates, and human-verified labels through scheduled discovery, automatic screening and preliminary annotation, and human review of image-specific evidence. The benchmark contains 407 verified AI-generated or edited images, each accompanied by a source webpage link and an evidence summary. Images retain the conditions encountered online, including compression, screenshots, and rec...

AuthorsZijian Yu, Hangwei Zhang, Jun Lan et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/3aeb8390-00ec-4890-a99a-ef7fb25af0bb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.