Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Same Judgment, Different Yes: Measuring Multilingual Judgment Profiles in Language Models

Multilingual evaluations often score a model's opening yes or no, a token that also carries model and language answering conventions. We ask when different ways of eliciting and reading an answer recover the same judgment, and when they measure an answer habit. We collect 1.1 million replies from eight models in six languages on up to 105 moral vignettes, varying the question's form, the answer constraint, and the reading of the reply, token or sentence, in both wordings (the FAR-6 battery). Story-level judgment profiles converge across the tested readouts and question forms, except for the yes/no token after a negative interrogative read under a preset mapping: on the same replies, token...

AuthorsHaonan Huang, Yuwei Lu, Chengkun Cai
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c75a749d-e046-4367-9660-bbb345fa6b4d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.