Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SciDiagBench: A Type-Specific Benchmark for Human-Aligned Evaluation of Scientific Diagrams

Recent agents have demonstrated strong capabilities in generating images from textual prompts, motivating their utilization for scientific diagram generation. Scientific diagrams naturally span diverse types, each characterized by distinct visual structures and content organization. Consequently, during peer review and other scientific evaluation, human experts naturally consider type-specific criteria when assessing their quality. However, existing VLM-based evaluation benchmarks fail to reflect the above human evaluation practices for two main reasons: 1) benchmark datasets typically lack a systematic categorization of different diagram types and thus adopt the same generic criteria for...

AuthorsHao Wang, Zixuan Li, Long Bai et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/022483c8-a859-4e76-a98e-a48794eecfdb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.