Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Privacy Accounting for Empirical Denoisers

Diffusion models have emerged as the foundation of modern generative systems, yet their high memorization capacity raises privacy concerns. While differentially private (DP) training provides formal guarantees, it comes at a cost in sample quality. In this work, we study a complementary question: how much privacy loss is incurred during the sampling process itself? Directly analyzing modern neural denoisers is challenging because their sensitivity to a single training example is generally intractable. To overcome this challenge, we construct and analyze a clipped privacy-accountable empirical denoiser, a training-free estimator of the Bayes-optimal denoiser, whose per-step sensitivity can...

AuthorsWilliam Cheng, Mijung Park, Dongjun Kim
Primary categorycs.LG
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/616d3108-8d60-4119-8dc6-44d735ba5fa7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.