Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benefit and Cost of Random-Token Replacement under Repeated Data: A Known-Entropy Decomposition and Evidence from Ten Real Corpora

When unique pretraining data is scarce, models see the same tokens many times and are thought to memorize. Random-token replacement, an input-corruption augmentation, is one remedy reported to lower validation loss, but a lower loss alone does not reveal which source of error it reduces. On a controlled source whose entropy rate is known in closed form, we show that replacement shrinks predictions toward the corpus average. We also introduce a decomposition that separates validation loss into approximation, estimation, and memorization terms. This shrinkage view predicts that replacement's bias cost needs no memorization but its benefit does. Memorization raises validation loss after its ...

AuthorsWonsup Shin, Jingu Kim
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 October 2026
Last updated at source20 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e3d554c4-a428-4b49-9ae3-406929261d79" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.