Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

What Not to Erase: Saliency-Constrained Augmentation for Low-Resource Handwritten Character Recognition

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and handwritten character recognition (HCR) in low-resource historical material collections often rely on data augmentation, yet augmentation strategies are typically evaluated almost exclusively through predictive accuracy. This leaves open whether a model's improved performance is accompanied by saliency stability. This question is important in low-resource historical HCR, where recognition is performed on variable and partially degraded letterforms and two models with similar predictive performance may differ in how consistently their saliency patterns respond to such variation. We therefore study saliency-guided augmentation as an explanation-aware ...

AuthorsParaskevi Platanou, John Pavlopoulos
Primary categorycs.CV
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/5c1fbece-fe18-42b0-a3be-3d10e6d6ed81" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 22 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.