Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Stronger artificial intelligence breakthroughs hasten their own exhaustion

Progress in artificial intelligence is widely assumed to scale with effort: more researchers, papers and investment should accelerate discovery. Theories of technological growth instead locate the difficulty of discovery in the space of ideas. Here we show that neither scale nor space is enough: breakthroughs depend on diverse attention, which collective concentration can deplete. Across 36 years of computer science, we analyze 7.2 million papers, 73,089 peer reviews and 3.7 million researchers and their topic shifts. The field expanded while its attention narrowed sharply after the Transformer. Over half of topic-shifting researchers moved into AI, especially mid-career ones, and reviewe...

AuthorsBeichen Lu, Honglin Bao, Qi Huang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.AIcs.CYecon.GN
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/3f274830-8098-4d7e-9efe-71caf9b8d31c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.