Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Which Agent's Skill Should Change? Group-Relative Credit Assignment for Evolving Multi-Agent Teams

Cooperative language-model agents can improve without weight updates by revising reusable skills, but only if a shared team reward is traced to the responsible agent and skill. Existing methods credit the skills present in each trajectory, yet presence is not responsibility: a harmful skill active in successful runs still earns positive credit. We present \textbf{GRSE}, \textbf{G}roup-\textbf{R}elative \textbf{S}kill \textbf{E}volution, which assigns behavioral credit by comparison: inspired by GRPO, it executes each question several times under the same skill libraries and contrasts the executions to credit agent--skill pairs, with structured diagnosis of failures. On HotpotQA and LoCoMo...

AuthorsYanan Ma, Yang Wang, David Le et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f1a92563-69a0-4f86-8439-5a3eab64dfe1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.