Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

GRID: Modeling Health Influencer Discourse as Argument Networks for Credibility Assessment

Health-related discussions on social media are increasingly shaped by influencers who offer diverse, and often competing perspectives on the same issue. Yet, such content is typically evaluated in isolation, without considering the broader discourse in which it appears. We introduce GRID (Grounded Reasoning over Interconnected Discourse), a framework for evaluating influencer content through collective inference over the surrounding discourse. GRID represents each video as an argumentation graph connecting claims to its central message, or takeaway, links related claims and takeaways across videos, grounds claims in scientific evidence, and jointly infers credibility over the resulting ne...

AuthorsNishanth Sridhar Nakshatri, Eylon Caplan, Dan Goldwasser
Primary categorycs.CL
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c4636771-d6e9-4c22-b93f-03ed8044af4f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.