Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Who Takes the Lead? Model Ability and Task-Conditioned Collaboration with Humans

As language-model agents grow more capable, they can carry more of a task without asking anyone for help. Falling reliance on a human partner is easy to read as a failure of collaboration when it may instead be a correct division of labor, and the rate of human involvement alone cannot tell the two apart. We study this systematically by placing an agent and a person under a shared objective while varying who holds the advantage: the human has a clear advantage, neither does, or the agent does. To obtain this control, we introduce a shared-control maze, in which an agent-controlled and a human-controlled avatar share the objective of reaching a common target in as few team turns as possible.

AuthorsWeien Li, Haochen Liu, Zeyu Li et al.
Primary category
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source—
hf-daily-papersshared-control mazeagent-controlled avatarhuman-controlled avatarco-playsolo performanceroute-conditioned human involvementgpt-5.6 solcommand a+
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/05e22038-7bbf-4870-8772-af1e629277d1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.