Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Fluent but Fallible: Benchmarking Hallucination and Factual Reliability in Large Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced natural language processing and artificial intelligence applications through their capabilities in reasoning, text generation and knowledge retrieval. However, LLMs are still vulnerable to two important challenges: hallucination, generating factually incorrect or fabricated content, and response deviation, meaning systematic deviations from ground-truth responses. These limitations raise serious concerns regarding reliability and trustworthiness in academic and research environments. This study offers a thorough comparative analysis using a variety of metrics of ten advanced LLMs ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude~3.5~Sonnet, LLaMA~3, Mistral,...

AuthorsOsama Shabih, Dayam Nadeem, Shahab Saquib Sohail et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/17484410-9dea-486b-9c9a-94c9c42f0bb3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.