Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Concerns in Benchmarking Jailbreaks: An Empirical Study of Attack Success Rates

Jailbreak methods are commonly compared using Attack Success Rate (ASR), but these comparisons depend on how responses are generated and judged. In this paper, we examine eight attacks against three open-weight language models using three evaluation procedures. Low-resource language attacks achieve a mean ASR of 96.0% under keyword matching but 2.7% under a Qwen3 evaluator following StrongREJECT scoring instructions. Changing the number and arrangement of attempts reverses the ranking of DeepInception and rewriting. In a separate experiment, sampling 100 responses for each unchanged request at Ollama's default temperature of 0.8 yields 100% ASR under keyword matching but 50% under the Qwe...

AuthorsLeon Tu Nguyen, Rohan Menon, Rafael Tappe Maestro et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/0fc845c2-6fa4-4947-aa62-11352f3dee48" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 21 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.