Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Secure Agentic Coding through Counterexample-Grounded Feedback

As coding models and agent harnesses become more capable, reliable security verification is becoming a central bottleneck. Improving secure code generation requires a signal whose reported progress remains aligned with actual program behavior under optimization; otherwise, an optimizer can improve the signal's verdict without removing the underlying vulnerability. Existing model-based approaches require models to either infer program behavior from source code or specify correct outcomes for adversarial tests, placing substantial reasoning demands on the security signal. We introduce \falcon{}, a counterexample-grounded verification framework that separates attack exploration from behavior...

AuthorsTue Le, Anh Nguyen Hoang, Gabriel Sasseville et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/80e477d0-f294-4c33-a188-f6cf20d0e229" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 20 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.