Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Auditing Semantic and Relational Reliability in Open-Vocabulary Human-Object Interaction Evaluation

Open-vocabulary human-object interaction detectors describe interactions in free text, and this creates a problem for evaluation. Category scoring rejects valid paraphrases, while semantic similarity scoring can reward predictions that name the wrong action or reverse the roles of the participants. We present a diagnostic protocol that holds every prediction fixed and scores it under five views, namely official category evaluation, an identity control, lexical normalization, graded semantic credit, and strict propositional equivalence. Comparing these views separates the effect of the matching engine from the effect of semantic credit. The protocol pairs controlled transformations that pr...

AuthorsS M Asif Hossain, Ruksat Khan Shayoni, Md Kishor Morol
Primary categorycs.CV
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d3b466f9-5171-4604-984e-c3e910b767e5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 22 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.