Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Inside the Scorer: Mechanistic Evidence on Rubric Control in LLM-Based Automated Essay Scoring from 25 Base Models

Automated essay scoring (AES) using large language models (LLMs) offers promising use cases for language assessment, yet high-stakes testing requires scores that are both controllable and verifiable, which current LLM-based scorers lack. Given that, we investigate whether LLM-based scorers form distinct internal representations for individual scoring rubrics and whether these representations can be independently controlled. Probing and steering 25 open-weight base LLMs (0.13B-10.31B parameters; 14 families) on human-scored BESTEP English writing tasks, we find that holistic scores are decodable from model activations for the longer tasks (Parts 2 and 3) and only weakly for the shortest (P...

AuthorsChungche Huang, Po-Ya Angela Wang, Shu-Kai Hsieh
Primary categorycs.CL
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/533385bf-a7bb-417a-bf28-506bd08cf4e5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 22 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.