Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Safety Offset Learning: When Benign Fine-Tuning Misaligns LLMs

Safety risks from fine-tuning are commonly characterized by the harmfulness of the training data:harmful fine-tuning is considered dangerous, while benign fine-tuning is often assumed to preservealignment. We argue that this view misses a more fundamental factor-the behavioral transition inducedby supervision. Harmful fine-tuning and safety-degrading benign fine-tuning can both be understoodas learning the same refusal-to-compliance transition, but on different data distributions. We studywhether such a transition learned on benign inputs can generalize to harmful requests. We constructbenign examples that an aligned model initially tends to refuse and pair them with their originalharmles...

AuthorsJesson Wang, Zhanhao Hu, Minghao Lin et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published19 October 2026
Last updated at source19 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/33c1e05b-9a66-4378-98c3-f975a5581880" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.