Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Beyond the record: evaluating probabilistic AI weather forecasts deep in the tail

Can probabilistic artificial intelligence (AI) weather forecasts retain skill beyond their training domain? We compare four state-of-the-art AI models (ArchesWeatherGen, U-Cast, WeatherNext2 and GenCast-mini) with the physics-based IFS-ENS over land in 2022, at 1.5° resolution and lead times of 2--10 days. Monthly ERA5 records from 1979--2021 define common historical boundaries, and we characterize new records set in 2022 by their depth, i.e., the exceedance margin relative to local historical variability. Two proper scores, record-threshold weighted CRPS and Brier score, assess the magnitude and probability of record exceedances across all eligible cases, retaining both missed extremes a...

AuthorsBastiaan Van Velthoven, Cas Decancq, Diego G. Miralles et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published18 October 2026
Last updated at source18 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/6c653fc7-97f4-404b-8438-2021a5137e5b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.