Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where Groups Split: A Probe Prior for Nonzero Within-Group Variance in RL Post-Training

Group relative policy optimization learns from a prompt only when the rewards in the sampled group disagree. With a binary verifier, a group that is entirely correct or entirely incorrect has within-group variance zero and a zero advantage. Uniform sampling continues to spend rollouts on prompts that are unanimous now and stay unanimous as training goes on. Pass rate is a weak forecast of that future. Two prompts at the same pass rate can move apart: one into the range where a finite group splits, and one toward a ceiling where the group becomes unanimous again. Aperture estimates the later pass rate from a short probe. A small subset of the pool is trained with the same recipe, every pro...

AuthorsJonah Ellison, Mateo Ruiz, Owen Pell et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published18 October 2026
Last updated at source18 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/944269d2-1250-4ba7-a153-70a40b60b8de" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.