Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Visual Sufficiency Landscapes: Understanding Query-Conditioned Reliability in Visual Token Pruning

Different visual token pruning strategies retain different subsets while maintaining similar task performance. This motivates a combinatorial question: how many visual subsets can preserve model behavior, and how does their abundance depend on the query? We introduce visual sufficiency landscapes to characterize this abundance. At a fixed layer and budget, visual sufficiency probability is the fraction of uniformly sampled subsets that jointly preserve the dense model's answer, reference-answer likelihood, and output distribution. Independent sampling replicates separate input variation from estimation noise. Across Qwen2.5-VL-7B, InternVL2-8B, and LLaVA-v1.5-7B, differences between input...

AuthorsZhenghan Li, Kexin Sun, Wei Zheng et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published18 October 2026
Last updated at source18 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c80e6f2d-5250-47ad-af42-6a98c7a0c0b6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.