Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Peer Pressure: Execution-Verified Co-Evolution of Attacker and Defender Populations for Code Security

LLM code agents increasingly ship code with little oversight, yet defenders trained on static vulnerability datasets fall behind adapting adversaries. We co-train attacker and defender instead, and let execution decide every reward: an attacker (Red) edits a real repository and earns nothing unless its patch applies, builds, passes the tests, completes its development task and reproduces a real exploit in an isolated container, whose path also labels the entry point, the critical operation and the trace between them. Peer-Relative Policy Optimization (PRPO) makes both sides populations of LoRA adapters over one frozen base and credits each against same-role peers that faced an identical c...

AuthorsKhushbu Pahwa, Yubin Ge, Daniele Bonadiman et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published17 October 2026
Last updated at source17 October 2026
cs.CRcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/5fb28c78-4e6e-462c-8e17-dda661eb952f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.