Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When LLM-Generated Refactorings Ripple: An Empirical Study of Repository Adoption Readiness

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to refactor source files, but file-local evaluations do not reveal changes to contracts, dependencies, or caller assumptions affecting repository adoption. To address this gap, we conduct 1,500 generation attempts across 150 production files from 15 open-source Java repositories, five LLM configurations, and two dependency-aware generation conditions: single-prompt refactoring and LangGraph-based multi-agent refactoring. Of these attempts, 1,455 yield complete candidates eligible for analysis. We evaluate these candidates using local changes, repository-facing structural indicators, detected caller impact, the behavioural-equivalence indi...

AuthorsMuhammad Waseem, Aakash Ahmad, Pekka Abrahamsson
Primary categorycs.SE
Published17 October 2026
Last updated at source17 October 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/5c144e24-0fb4-437a-8dd3-7dc5a6308e3f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.