Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do Conversational Agents Need Explicit Memory? A Controlled Comparison with Raw-History Retrieval

Explicit memory systems transform conversation history into persistent representations intended to improve future access, often at substantial construction cost. Yet it remains unclear whether this added complexity yields better answer accuracy than retrieving directly from raw history. This study compares six state-of-the-art explicit memory systems with raw-history RAG on LongMemEval-S and BEAM-100K under original and controlled retrieval settings. We find only localized gains for particular question types and tight run-time context budgets, with no consistent advantage over strong raw-history RAG baselines. Oracle retrieval shows that some systems fail to preserve answer-supporting inf...

AuthorsYongjie Zhou, Shuai Wang, Bevan Koopman et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published17 October 2026
Last updated at source17 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/0d34e8c8-d31d-4cb4-ab8d-f9f79a3c2a77" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.