Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Much Do Activation Monitors Benefit from Original Model Computations?

One powerful way to safeguard AI systems is to monitor their internal computations--where signs of undesirable behavior might be more easily detectable than from models' inputs and outputs alone. However, recent studies begin to question the premise that activations provide a unique window into model behavior. In this paper, we study how much of activation monitors' success depends on access to the original behavior-generating computations. Within a fixed choice of target model and monitoring architecture, we compare how well monitors trained and evaluated on trajectories that differ in computational context can predict the behavior of the original execution, after the transcript is chang...

AuthorsJames Oldfield, Shawn Im, Jay J Culligan et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published17 October 2026
Last updated at source17 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8fbf15f6-8c3a-41a3-a0df-728870a81191" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.