Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Unbounded Losses, Unchecked Inputs: Measuring the Safeguards of LLM Options-Trading Agents

Large language model (LLM) agents now place options orders at retail brokers, and developers publish open-source options agents faster than anyone has examined them. Prior security work on trading agents scored academic equities designs by whether an attacker can flip a buy-or-sell decision. We present the first measurement of the options agents that brokers and developers ship, scored by the safeguards they enforce and by the worst loss their documented order paths can reach. We screened 765 GitHub repositories, broker documentation, and the research literature and found 215 eligible repositories and 8 broker-native agent interfaces. We then scored 26 systems, including every broker inte...

AuthorsMengxiao Wang, Nitesh Saxena
Primary categorycs.CR
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b6c7a866-030e-4d89-ac16-6cfa6ca0ed38" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.