Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Candidate-dependent residual routing trades top-of-list accuracy for recall in sequential recommendation

Candidate-dependent routing lets a sequential recommender weight a user's past behaviors differently for each item it scores. We test whether this flexibility helps by adding a small residual routing module to a self-attentive baseline, in two versions that differ only in what sets the routing weights: the user's history representation or the candidate item's embedding. Across five paired seeds on the REES46 cosmetics-shop dataset, with matched training for all three models, candidate-dependent routing leaves the primary metric, normalized discounted cumulative gain at cutoff ten (NDCG@10), essentially unchanged (mean relative change +0.003%). Secondary and exploratory analyses show that ...

AuthorsHan Chen, Yingrui Li
Primary categorycs.IR
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ece182f9-33d7-4cde-974f-a027b90c3276" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.