Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Discuss More, Comment Less: Boosting Automated Research via Multi-Perspective Collaborative Review

As automated research is increasingly adopted for writing papers, automated review has become a critical link between paper generation and quality control. However, existing methods largely rely on single-model feedback or simple review aggregation, failing to explicitly model expert responsibilities or collective deliberation in actual peer reviews, which limits effective cross-examination and reliable decision-making. Therefore, we formulate paper review as a computational modeling problem of peer review mechanisms and propose RoundtableReview, a deliberative multi-agent framework for enhancing automated research. RoundtableReview structures each paper into eight semantic slots and coor...

AuthorsJunkai Zhou, Jiajia Wu, Zhaoyi Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/770cfbcf-6f72-47ec-bf5d-8fa3da1d387a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.