Recognizing Study Lineage Is Not Enough: Over-Crediting Same-Trial Evidence in LLM-Based Medical Verification
Publication count is not study count. A model can identify shared trial lineage correctly in a direct task yet over-credit a second publication from the same trial when aggregating evidence. We evaluate this behavior in medical LLM verification using 14 source-audited clinical families and five model conditions. The families span provenance, clinical applicability, result direction, and composition; the provenance families provide the direct lineage tests. Recognition and aggregation are separate stateless calls, and repeated calls assess within-input stability. Across all three original provenance families, GPT-5.5 identifies the independent update in 10/10 recognition calls per family b...
| Authors | Mukand Krishna, Anoushka Harit, Chenghao Xiao et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 16 October 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 16 October 2026 |
Popularity, last 5 days
0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.