Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Deconstructing Multi-Task Active Learning: The Paradox of Gradient Conflict and Orthogonal Decomposition

Existing multi-task active learning (MTL-AL) methods predominantly rely on linear scalarization of heterogeneous objectives such as uncertainty, diversity, and gradient conflict. We argue that this entangled formulation is fundamentally limited, as linear combination fails to capture Pareto-optimal trade-offs under conflicting objectives. We propose a shift from combination to deconstruction and introduce a principled framework that rethinks MTL-AL along three orthogonal dimensions. First, we identify the Conflict Paradox: although the optimization literature treats gradient conflict as interference to be suppressed, penalizing conflict when ranking candidates is measurably worse than not...

AuthorsJuho Jung, Seongjae Kang, Jinyoung Han
Primary categorycs.LG
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/2bc6dc17-049b-4fdc-b86c-23b6fdd48cd0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.