Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Truth in Contrast: Calibrated Factual Evidence from Language Model Likelihoods

Large Language Models (LLMs) encode substantial factual knowledge. Yet, estimating confidence in factual claims reliably remains challenging. We study likelihood-based factual confidence from the complementary perspectives of discrimination and calibration across multilingual factual statements. Specifically, we instantiate contrastive generative likelihoods as Contrastive Factual Evidence (CFE), which compares the likelihood of the same claim under competing factual and non-factual conditions, and derive its probabilistic counterpart, the Contrastive Factual Posterior (CFP). We show analytically that CFP calibration depends on the differential error between the two surrogate conditionals...

AuthorsPonhvoan Srey, Jason Lucas, Pittawat Taveekitworachai et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/82aea0fa-df83-4847-881c-563ccf6d92a6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.