Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

"You" Is Not Toxic: How LLM Labelers Rewrite the Web's Conversation Laws

What the Web community believes about toxic conversations, such as that toxicity rises in longer and deeper threads, was measured mostly with Google's Perspective API, which is shutting down; large language models (LLMs) will make the next measurements. We find that LLM labelers mistake second-person address for toxicity, and that this one bias manufactures laws that human labels do not show. On 1.25 million news comments with crowd labels, Claude Haiku flags 12% of the non-toxic comments that contain no "you" and 51% of those with four or more; a single crowd rater flags 6% and 10%. Deeper replies address someone more often, so under Haiku toxicity rises with reply depth (+0.93 percentag...

AuthorsLiang Yue, Eric A. Vance
Primary categorycs.SI
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.SIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d7db5a89-a2eb-4b5e-a527-9ea92d452df6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.