Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can We Use Saliency Maps for the Evaluation of Generative Image Models?

Evaluating generative image models remains challenging, as commonly used metrics depend on fixed pretrained feature extractors optimized for different tasks that do not always align with human realism perception across datasets and model families. To address this limitation, we investigate a human-inspired evaluation framework that avoids representations learned for unrelated tasks. Specifically, we train a generator-specific classifier to distinguish real images from samples produced by a given model and analyze its decisions using saliency maps. Across diverse benchmarks, we observe that these classifiers learn generator-specific artifacts rather than a universal notion of "fakeness", e...

AuthorsEleonora Ristori, Luca Bindini, Marco Lippi et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d9633fda-b96e-4bbc-b80e-c2a70ecbbc24" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.