Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Data-Driven Prediction of Optimal MPI Rank Placement and Node Count for Memory-Bound CFD on AMD EPYC Clusters

Users who run a memory-bound OpenFOAM case on an AMD EPYC cluster must decide how many nodes to use and how many MPI ranks to place on each core complex. The fastest choice is often not the cheapest one. This paper revisits our earlier analytical model of this performance and energy trade-off with 560 measured configurations of the motorBike case on five Zen 4 and Zen 5 EPYC processors, including socket power from processor telemetry. On up to four nodes, small meshes are both fastest and cheapest on a single node on most processors. For the largest mesh the largest node count is both the fastest and the cheapest option, because its speedup is superlinear. A genuine trade-off arises only ...

AuthorsMarcin Lawenda, Łukasz Szustak, Aleksandra Krasicka
Primary categorycs.PF
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.PFcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/5902bd32-436c-4407-a045-3ad6e0b175d7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.