Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the tradeoff between robustness and geometric accuracy in adversarial training

For non-parametric binary classification in the presence of an adversary, we prove an optimal quantitative estimate for adversarial classifiers controlling geometric accuracy, as measured by the Hausdorff distance to the Bayes classifier, in terms or their robustness, as encoded by the adversarial budget $\varepsilon$. This rigorously shows that robust classifiers sacrifice at most $O(\sqrt{\varepsilon})$ or $O(\varepsilon)$ in accuracy, depending on the regularity of the underlying Bayes classifier. In contrast to prior work on the incompatibility of robustness and accuracy over low-complexity hypothesis classes, our work shows that high-complexity hypothesis classes allow for robust cla...

AuthorsRachel Morris, Ryan Murray, Kerrek Stinson
Primary categorycs.LG
Published16 October 2026
Last updated at source16 October 2026
cs.LGmath.AP
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/642e4a77-b22c-487b-8ba4-1dcc40f0e586" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 5 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 23 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.