Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Native Geometry vs. Linear Recoverability: How Alignment Changes Platonic Scaling

Do larger models learn increasingly similar representations of the same world? The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) predicts that they should, but similar can mean native cosine geometry---nearest-neighbour structure induced by cosine similarity before any learned alignment---or linear recoverability: correspondence revealed by a supervised linear map. Using matched Legacy Survey and Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) embeddings across five model families, we find that Ridge alignment strengthens the relationship between model size and cross-dataset neighbourhood correspondence relative to native cosine geometry. The effect appears in all five families and persists when both representations ...

AuthorsAngus Hoy, Austin Lutterbach, Jasper Chong et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.LGastro-ph.IM
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b2d6509b-2efc-46ad-8e62-3d5a2bbc6c85" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 6 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.