Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Alert-List Concordance for Evaluating Imputation Strategies in ICU Sepsis Prediction

Preprocessing is an under-measured reliability risk in clinical prediction: a model can keep a similar AUROC and still change who receives an alert. Imputation quality is commonly evaluated using reconstruction error or aggregate discrimination, neither of which directly measures agreement on which patients are flagged. At a matched alert rate, pipelines with similar aggregate performance can produce different patient lists. This question is especially relevant under the frequent, structured missingness of real ICU records. We therefore introduce alert-list concordance, which asks whether two pipelines identify the same high-risk patients, measured by the Jaccard similarity of their top-k...

AuthorsPriyanka Siddappa, Muntaqim Ahmed Raju, Shifat Haider Al Amin et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.LGq-bio.QM
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bed00542-70c2-48ed-ba95-294f4eb6f422" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 6 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.