Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

AuditKIT: A Unified Evaluation Spine for Benchmarking, Judging, and Comparing Large Language Models and Agentic Systems

Evaluating language models and agents requires combining benchmark accuracy, judge-based assessment, runtime performance, tool-use behavior, and retrieval quality. Differences in interfaces, metric semantics, and trace formats complicate these comparisons and can hide failures in agentic workflows. We present AuditKIT, a source-available evaluation library that records these measurements in one result representation, with direction-aware metric contracts, configuration fingerprints, and extensible metrics and backends. For agents, it provides turn-aware tool-call matching, separates parallel from sequential execution, and distinguishes verified task outcomes from trajectory-level diagnost...

AuthorsShreeyans Arora, Utsav Avaiya, Zera Lyngkhoi et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.IRcs.SE
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e166350e-05e7-42fa-b764-db09644a49de" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 6 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.