Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Where Prefill Expert Reduction Hurts MoE Models: A Few Prompt Tokens Carry Most of the Short-Answer F1 Loss

Running prompt tokens through fewer routed experts during prefill is a simple way to make mixture-of-experts (MoE) serving cheaper, yet it is unclear what this damages. We locate the damage with token-, layer- and attention-path interventions on short-answer question answering in four MoE families. At half the experts the F1 loss of three families is mostly answer form: the model still finds the answer but stops answering briefly. In Qwen3-30B-A3B this loss is made at the two chat-template tokens before the answer, and in DeepSeek-V2-Lite at the first 8-32 prompt tokens, where its instruction sits; by answer likelihood these positions account for about half and a fifth of the damage. Redu...

AuthorsZhiyuan Wang
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/226654ea-a7ca-405b-9d72-b9f246ab52f3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 6 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 24 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.