Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Not X, but When: Diagnosing a Mandarin LLM Writing Tic through Contextual Appropriateness

Recurring expressions in model-written text are often treated as signatures of machine authorship, yet most of them serve legitimate functions. Whether such an expression is a tic depends on whether the model knows when it is called for. This judgment of appropriateness, central to communicative competence, remains largely unexamined for language models. We study it through the Mandarin corrective construction bushi X, ershi Y ("not X, but Y"). Drawing on Gricean pragmatics and corrective negation, we introduce a decision tree that classifies uses as substantive, optional, or defective by testing whether the context makes X a live alternative and whether rejecting X is informative. Five c...

AuthorsYihang Peng, Yi Jing, Dewen Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7946d623-80a8-443e-868b-508315eaa312" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 16 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.