Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Beyond Context Length: Characterising the Difficulty of Long-Context Reasoning

Long-context language models support ever longer context windows, and evaluations typically treat context length as the main indicator of difficulty. However, context length alone cannot explain why models fail on long-context tasks that require reasoning over complex information. Contexts of equal length can pose very different challenges: a task may be solvable from a single local passage, or it may require integrating evidence distributed across the full context. We quantitatively characterise this difficulty through three properties: evidence scope, how much necessary information must be found; evidence dispersion, how widely that information is scattered within the context; and reaso...

AuthorsShiwen Qin, Cameron Barker, Henry Gouk et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/89536ff3-2791-46af-901e-ffd9db034d37" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 16 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.