Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Time to Fake It: Continual Machine Learning Intensifies Unfairness in Deepfake Detection

Deepfake detectors safeguard against misinformation, rendering their failures as much a societal as a technical concern. As generators constantly evolve, detectors trained on static datasets miss newly arising threats, while progressive training interferes catastrophically. Yet, mitigating forgetfulness in terms of accuracy, the prevalent focus of continual learning (CL), is insufficient to reflect real-world impact. We therefore scrutinize the effects of CL methods with respect to evolving fairness. To this end, we analyze four dimensions of fairness across diverse demographics for detectors trained progressively on a chronological sequence of 11 real-world deepfake generation methods. T...

AuthorsKajaree Das, Oliver Böse, Subarnaduti Paul et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9831174e-0d90-4f73-989a-1dc8ee04d0b2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 18 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.