Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Human Interventions as Labels: Localizing, Steering, and (Sometimes) Editing the Computations Behind LLM Agent Failures

When an LLM agent misbehaves, a human steps in, and that intervention is usually discarded or replayed as training data. We treat it instead as a measurement: a label pointing at the internal computation that failed. We study it in a controlled agent environment, on one failure (asking a clarifying question when the request was already unambiguous), with labels from a rule-based overseer validated against blind human judgment. Claims cover eligible models, which both over-ask and sometimes act on matched unambiguous requests: five of thirteen qualified (Qwen2.5-3B, gemma-2-2b, OLMo-3-7B, Mistral-Nemo-12B, Phi-4). Four findings. First, the ask-vs-act decision is causally localizable in eve...

AuthorsCesare Zavattari, Alessandro Tommasi, Giuseppe Prencipe
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b26243f0-44d9-4002-a030-4bcb08471f48" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.