Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

DialFork: Going Beyond Factuality to Evaluate Procedural Hallucination in Conversational Agents

Large language models (LLMs) deployed as conversational agents are increasingly expected to follow procedural logic. While factual hallucination has received extensive attention, a different failure mode has been overlooked: procedural hallucination, in which an agent produces individually fluent and factually plausible utterances while deviating from the intended conversational process. We introduce DialFork, the first benchmark to measure this failure mode on raw dialogue text. DialFork is built by forking conformant dialogues at controlled turn positions and injecting one of four hallucination types, yielding 36,278 dialogues across 24 tasks in 12 domains; 30 human annotators validate ...

AuthorsSergio Burdisso, Esaú Villatoro-Tello, Dairazalia Sánchez-Cortés et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9836d2f3-ac96-4ddc-a36f-c0bea8c615fc" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 18 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.