Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Money-Mule Detection as a Relational Learning Problem: A Study on the RBIH NFPC Dataset

Money-mule networks move criminal funds through many small transfers, each of which looks ordinary on its own. What marks an account as a mule lies outside any single transfer: in the counterparties and addresses its network shares, and in the shape of its activity over time. Production systems remain largely rule-based and see neither, while most research classifies transactions rather than accounts, recovering account-level risk only by aggregating afterwards. We instead score the account directly, reading the bank's relational schema as a heterogeneous graph in which rows are nodes and foreign keys are edges. Each account is scored from a multi-hop neighbourhood using per-column encode...

AuthorsOwais Ahmad, Anirudh Deodhar
Primary categorycs.AI
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/df1846a3-9d9d-48b2-b08d-fcfd406e7deb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 3 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 18 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.