Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Bias Control and Injection for Multi-Agent Aggregation

Multi-agent reasoning with large language models (LLMs) raises a central question for collective decision-making: when agents disagree, whose decision should be trusted? Resolving such disagreements is difficult because agents' decisions are susceptible to non-semantic biases such as majority pressure and response-style preferences, which can obscure the quality of the underlying reasoning. Our analysis shows how bias can be both mitigated and exploited: bias control improves initial answer selection, while bias injection elicits decision instability that serves as a reliability signal. Building on these findings, we introduce a test-time aggregation framework that requires neither valida...

AuthorsSungjae Lee, Soheil Abbasloo, Jabin Koo et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.MA
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c9e9d060-6e85-44e7-ba93-66067f27d75d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.