Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

VisualTrust: Video Reasoning under On-Screen Claim Framing

On-screen text can describe what a video shows, or it can frame what the video is supposed to mean. Current benchmarks treat both alike, testing whether a model can read the text rather than whether it should trust it. We study claim deference, multimodal large language models' tendency to let an on-screen claim override conflicting visual evidence. We introduce VisualTrust, a counterfactual benchmark with 5,063 cases across 14 claim-fact classes. Each case pairs a question with three versions of the same video: one with no claim, one with an accurate claim, and one with a misleading claim that alters a single grounded fact. The option the misleading claim supports is the trap answer. Acr...

AuthorsHuachao Zhu, Junjielong Xu, Sicheng Li et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published15 October 2026
Last updated at source15 October 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ea6e6d1d-5e1d-4db6-804c-e627c96e4f23" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 2 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.